đwhy bother? just use @Polkadot.
They keep circling around multisigs, security councils, reinventing consensus, upgrade mechanisms, rollup incentivesâŠ
At the end of the day, itâs the same old problem.
Polkadotâs rollups (parachains) have been decentralized from day one â inheriting relay chain consensus & security, not relying on a centralized operator.
Great thread on why Base (and L2s) are non-custodial extensions of @ethereum.
But hereâs the difference: @Polkadot doesnât need Stage 1/2 committees or exit games.
Its relaychain was natively designed to secure rollups (parachains) from day 1 â shared security, no extra trust assumptions.
Thatâs the power of native rollup architecture. đââïž
4.25K
29
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.